Gap-Definability as a Closure Property
نویسندگان
چکیده
Gap-definability and the gap closure operator were defined by S. Fenner, L. Fortnow and S. Kurth (J. Comput. System Sci. 48, 116 148 (1994)). Few complexity classes were known at that time to be gapdefinable. In this paper, we give simple characterizations of both gapdefinability and the gap-closure operator, and we show that many complexity classes are gap-definable, including P, P, PSPACE, EXP, NEXP, MP (Middle-bit P), and BP } P. If a class is closed under union and intersection and contains < and 7*, then it is gapdefinable if and only if it contains SPP; its gap-closure is the closure of this class together with SPP under union and intersection. On the other hand, we give some examples of classes which are reasonable and gapdefinable but not closed under union (resp. intersection, complement). Finally, we show that a complexity class such as PSPACE or PP, if it is not equal to SPP, contains a maximal gap-definable many one reduction-closed subclass, which is properly between SPP and the class of all PSPACE-incomplete (PP-incomplete) sets with respect to containment. The gap-closure of the class of all incomplete sets in PSPACE (resp. PP) is PSPACE (resp. PP). 1996 Academic Press, Inc.
منابع مشابه
Definability and Compression
A compression algorithm takes a finite structure of a class K as input and produces a finite structure of a different class K’ as output. Given a property P on the class K defined in a logicL, we study the definability of property P on the class K’. We consider two compression schemas on unary ordered structures (words), compression by runlength encoding and the classical Lempel-Ziv. First-orde...
متن کاملDefinability properties and the congruence closure
We introduce a natural class of quantifiers Th containing all monadic type quantifiers, all quantifiers for linear orders, quantifiers for isomorphism, Ramsey type quantifiers, and plenty more, showing that no sublogic of Lo~o,(Th) or countably compact regular sublogic of L~o,(Th), properly extending L,o,o, satisfies the uniform reduction property for quotients. As a consequence, none of these ...
متن کاملDomain Closure Conditions and Definability Preservation
We show in Section (2) the importance of closure of the domain under finite unions, in particular for Cumulativity, and representation results. We see that in the absence of this closure, Cumulativity fans out to an infinity of different conditions. We introduce in Section (3) the concept of an algebraic limit, and discuss its importance. We then present a representation result for a new concep...
متن کاملOn Defining 'I' "I logy"
Could we define " I " ? Throughout this article we give a negative answer to this question. More exactly, we show that there is no definition for " I " in a certain way. But this negative answer depends on our definition of definability. Here, we try to consider sufficient generalized definition of definability. In the middle of paper a paradox will arise which makes us to modify the way we use...
متن کاملGap-deenability as a Closure Property ?
Gap-deenability and the gap-closure operator were deened in FFK91]. Few complexity classes were known at that time to be gap-deenable. In this paper, we give simple characterizations of both gap-deenability and the gap-closure operator, and we show that many complexity classes are gap-deenable, including P #P , P #P1] , PSPACE, EXP, NEXP, MP, and BP P. If a class is closed under union, intersec...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Inf. Comput.
دوره 130 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1993